☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 27 days agoCouldn't have happened to a nicer guylemmy.mlimagemessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1223arrow-down110
arrow-up1213arrow-down1imageCouldn't have happened to a nicer guylemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 27 days agomessage-square100fedilink
minus-squaretrevor@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-225 days agoYes. That solution would be to not lie about it by calling something that isn’t open source “open source”.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·25 days agoPlenty of debate on what classifies as an open source model last I checked, but I wasn’t expecting honesty from you there anyways.
minus-squaretrevor@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·25 days agoYou won’t see me on the side of the “debate” that launders language in defense of the owning class ¯_(ツ)_/¯
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·25 days agoNobody is doing that, but keep making bad faith arguments if you feel the need to.
Yes. That solution would be to not lie about it by calling something that isn’t open source “open source”.
Plenty of debate on what classifies as an open source model last I checked, but I wasn’t expecting honesty from you there anyways.
You won’t see me on the side of the “debate” that launders language in defense of the owning class ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Nobody is doing that, but keep making bad faith arguments if you feel the need to.