qaz@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDiplomacyEnglish · edit-215 hours agoTariffslemmy.worldimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1328arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1322arrow-down1imageTariffslemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDiplomacyEnglish · edit-215 hours agomessage-square67fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepiccololinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoMore like resetting the election forcing both parties to pick new candidates.
minus-squareMothmanDelorian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 hours agoWhich we don’t do either unless there is demonstrable proof that the election was fraudulent and we don’t have. You keep making the authoritarian/dictatorial choice that doesn’t align with the rule of law. Why?
More like resetting the election forcing both parties to pick new candidates.
Which we don’t do either unless there is demonstrable proof that the election was fraudulent and we don’t have.
You keep making the authoritarian/dictatorial choice that doesn’t align with the rule of law. Why?