• trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Yeah. I’m sad to say that, about a year ago, I switched back to macOS because it handles accessibility waaaaay better. And I don’t even use screen readers. It sounds like their situation is even worse :/

    I just need the ability to easily zoom in and out using Super+scroll up/down (without causing performance issues or visual jank) and trackpad gestures that aren’t extremely limited. Granted, both of these things may be more of a DE thing, but wherever the issue lies, I would like them fixed.

    • Kevin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      KDE let’s you do that first one, though it’s ctrl+super. It’s one of my favourite lesser known features.

    • OrekiWoof@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      linux developers only care about shit they themselves care about, powertripping and some stupid principles they made up, not about making a usable environment for everyone

      • bruhduh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s elitism as per usual, i daily drive Linux for 9 years already and always point this out, if we want the year of Linux truly come, then elitism must be stopped as majority of people won’t come to Linux if it’s inconvenient to them and majority of people not a techy guys, Linux guys want people to like Linux but don’t want Linux to BECOME likeable to majority and want it to persist as elite subculture, that’s the MAIN paradox of Linux community and all other problems like systemd vs other init, x11 vs Wayland, tiling wm vs full DE, distro wars, all stem from this same reason, Linux users wanna FEEL elite but want mass adoption and mass recognition of Linux while it’s not yet accessible to everyone or even becoming less accessible like in this case we’re discussing

        • yoevli@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          X11 versus Wayland isn’t some kind of holy war; Wayland was specifically designed as a successor protocol to the largely cobbled-together X and is objectively superior to it in most ways outside of accessibility.

          • bruhduh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Right, as I’ve and many people here said, wayland is still not FULLY completed for AVERAGE user and said average user is not going to code patches, he just going to walk away from wayland and from Linux, and this is pushing the year of desktop Linux farther and farther from us