I share it even though it’s not very good only because I’m using internet as a my journal lately. lol. I hope you don’t hate it too much!

  • rippermonty@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I agree with you assessment. Consistency in detail is an issue here. I changed my mind few times while painting it, whether to make the details loose or closely knit.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I’m looking at it with fresh eyes and I can’t help but notice that it’s mostly natural things that are loosely detailed and everything built, save for the road, is sharply detailed. Was that on purpose?

      • rippermonty@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        haha, no. It’s just lack of commitment, I wasn’t sure where I wanted to keep the focus so everything came haphazardly. When I see finished art pieces on the web, artists usually mention the time they spent on it. It’s like 10, 12 hours sometimes. I sort of give up after 2 hours. Very rarely I paint for 3 to 4 hours and difference is noticeable in those pieces.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That’s a perfectly valid art style! This is pretty much me when I work in physical media because I can’t devote much time to it and doing it over multiple sittings takes more planning than I want to do. For some reason, I’m more comfortable taking my time with digital, though.