• Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Which part of this are you on board with?

    changes that make it easier for rich male rapists to get away with it and trash their victims’ reputations when they speak up.

    Because all I see is opportunities for rich boys’ lawyers the chance to disrupt a school exclusion meeting and turn it into a media circus debating the victim’s sex life in detail, and if you think that isn’t how that plays out, you haven’t been paying attention.

    Your point is entirely based on trashing other people’s skepticism that the rapist president might not have young rape victims interests at heart, and I have to call out your gullability on that point. It’s absolutely not irrelevant that Trump himself is a rapist, and repeatedly insisting that it is defies logic.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Because all I see is opportunities for rich boys’ lawyers

      Because you are willfully blind.

      turn it into a media circus

      Title IX hearings are not public, nor is anyone arguing they should be public. It’s just a strawman argument you and people like you are making.

      Your point is entirely based on trashing other people’s skepticism that the rapist president might not have young rape victims interests at heart, and I have to call out your gullability on that point.

      I am trashing peoples inability to actually think about and evaluate a policy for themselves. So yes, I trash people who have to resort to trashing Trump instead of being able to intelligently discuss a policy.

      It’s not like I believe Trump actually cares for fairness. Probably just broken clock being right twice a day.

      I am not the gullible one here.