• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ah, okay. I’m sorry that I assumed you meant the word that you said and couldn’t read your mind. I’ll keep working on that telepathy, and you keep working on being accurate. One day we’ll understand each other.

    Now if what you want is fairness, explain to me how the administration on these panels can be unbiased when their salaries and jobs rely on the fact that they’re not known as the “rape university”. Explain to me how these victims could appeal an unfair judgment made by biased administration.

    Our legal process is filled with ways to make sure you get a fair trial, and even then not everyone does. This kangaroo court they’re setting up does not have any of those provisions and will not be fair. All it does is dissuade people from reporting.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Our legal process is filled with ways to make sure you get a fair trial, and even then not everyone does. This kangaroo court they’re setting up does not have any of those provisions and will not be fair. All it does is dissuade people from reporting.

      So your alternative is, let’s not even try to have a court with evidence, let’s just have one kangoroo decide whose life gets ruined based on their prejudices.

      Now if what you want is fairness, explain to me how the administration on these panels can be unbiased when their salaries and jobs rely on the fact that they’re not known as the “rape university”.

      How is that not the current situation already? Also, since when this does not work the other way as well, not wanting to be known as “university that protects rapists”?