kinther@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 13 hours agoWhy are the Democrats so spineless?www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1274arrow-down113cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1261arrow-down1external-linkWhy are the Democrats so spineless?www.theguardian.comkinther@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 13 hours agomessage-square62fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareshoulderoforion@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down23·13 hours agowell, no, not a coup, a constitutional crisis, but not a coup
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 hours agoIdk man I’d say it falls under the definition of coup. With extra steps sure, still a coup tho imo
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up62·12 hours agoIt’s not a coup unless it’s from the Potomac Valley region of the US. Otherwise, it’s just a sparkling crisis.
minus-squareBigFig@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 hours agoEh more bud light than four loko
minus-squareblackbelt352@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·12 hours agoIt’s a distinction without a difference. It’s an unlawful seizure of power.
minus-squaremindbleachlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 hours agoAn elected official becoming a dictator is still a coup d’etat. The previous government no longer exists.
well, no, not a coup, a constitutional crisis, but not a coup
Idk man I’d say it falls under the definition of coup. With extra steps sure, still a coup tho imo
It’s not a coup unless it’s from the Potomac Valley region of the US. Otherwise, it’s just a sparkling crisis.
The Four Loko of coups
Eh more bud light than four loko
It’s a distinction without a difference. It’s an unlawful seizure of power.
An elected official becoming a dictator is still a coup d’etat. The previous government no longer exists.