• CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think the analysts last Monday calling it the end of closed AI weren’t too far off after all. It’s wild too because basically no technology of any value isn’t commoditized in short order, so to think they could keep a billion-dollar moat around it forever shows some incredible hubris.

    I’m really excited though, hopefully getting more and more parts of the complete contemporary AI tool chain into the FOSS world will make these tools available to access and for the benefit of the majority of people.

    • Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree, in a sea of bad news, this is some very good news.

      I hope it continues and robs Musk, Thiel and the other Big Tech hobgoblins of the power they were dreaming AI would give them.

      • psmgx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Bullets would do a better job of that. And let’s be real, they still have oodles of money and a desire to crush opposition. But it’s good their AI isnt a walled garden.

    • mindbleach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      A trillion-dollar moat.

      These people live in a different fucking reality.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s the most delicious development of 2025, really. These tech bros we sure they found Gold when they convinced all investors that they needed billions to create these models but now it will all come crashing down.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I suppose other parts of critical software insfrustructure (Linux) are also OSS too and only the specific uses are closed source.

  • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s 22% worse.

    That’s basically wrong half the time vs wrong 1/3 of the time.

    • Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, but GPT-4 was at 7% and regarded as world best only months ago.

      The true significance here, is that they’ve replicated the industry leader so easily and so quickly.