• 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      It was a 0day back then, I guess, so it (in some unknown magic way) keeps that designation forever, apparently.

      Real reason: people want clicks on their slop, so they bait your clicks with nonsense.

      • admin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The first time I heard it, it meant that it was a vuln present since the launch of that version unknown to the publisher, so meaning on day 0 it was possible to exploit it.

        Then, when I was studying for a certification I learned they changed the definition to mean it was the number of days a vendor had to patch that vulnerability, and in some cases after being patched these vulnerabilities would get a name assigned to them.

        And now, is more of a clickbait word for articles.

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I got hit by what I believe was 0day WinRar vulnerability. Installed a nasty XMR miner that was a massive pain to disable. It took over the whole system and blocked any attempts around removal or even reading relevant articles about the miner.

    Was able to get rid of it via safe mode and finding a cleaning tool from rather niche (region-focused) sources.

    • admin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Was able to get rid of it via safe mode and finding a cleaning tool from rather niche (region-focused) sources.

      Is always a Spanish, Portuguese brasileiro or Cyrillic software, I swear.