r/RetroGaming is very strict about retro. They say the Nintendo 64 is retro while the PlayStation 2 is modern. This despite the fact the PlayStation 2 is now 25 years old.

So I got to wonder about this community deems as “retro”.

Or a better question: what’s considered retro and not retro? What’s the fine line between retro and modern?

  • samus12345@lemm.eeEnglish
    3·
    3 hours ago

    Anything that isn’t HD and on a console that’s designed to be always online. So PS3 and 360 aren’t retro to me, but Wii is, as are most portables prior to the Switch. It’s not the age of the game that makes it retro to me, but its design philosophy. And of course any new game intentionally designed to look or feel old is retro, the original meaning of the word.