• silence7@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    It was always a substitute for paying to maintain your parents or grandparents in retirement. Unless you’re an immigrant, you’ve already been getting it back.

      • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        The money they paid was so that their parents and grandparents had a little something going into retirement.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Exactly. It’s a system that works almost entirely as a pay-as-you-go system, with each generation paying for the retirement of their elders.

          • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            They’re paid out according to their contributions. But they’re paid with money current workers are paying in. It is technically a ponzi, but was designed to be sustainable instead of promising reckless profits.

            • Yeller_king@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s technically not a ponzi, it’s just a standard pay-as-you-go system which requires some sort of growth in revenues (such as population growth or changes in taxation) to be sustainable.

              A ponzi scheme is fraud that can never pay out what it promised.

              • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                29 days ago

                It can also be sustainable if the surplus during population growth are invested and not spent.

                Somehow with these systems governments are very silent when they can skim off the top because more people are paying in and they can use that money to patch other holes in the budget, but they somehow become very critical of the system once that money would need to be paid back from the budget.