I hate people who treat them like some toys and fantasize about them. That makes me think they are in some sort of death cult. That they found socially acceptable way to love violence.

I would still get one for safety but it is a tool made for specifically one thing. To pierce the skin and rip through the inner organs of a person.

They can serve a good purpose but they are fundamentally grim tools of pain and suffering. They shouldn’t be celebrated and glorified in their own right, that is sick. They can be used to preserve something precious but at a price to pay.

  • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 小时前

    Firearms decrease your safety in any but the most dire situation

    This doesn’t have to be the case. Guns can be safe with proper regulation and enforcement.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 小时前

      You’re missing my point.

      Any situation where a loaded and functional firearm is present is necessarily less safe than one without it except in the most dire circumstances.

      In such a dire circumstance, your having a firearm can - not will, but can - ward off, injure, or kill someone or something that presents a serious and imminent danger to you. But by and large, almost all situations don’t present that kind of serious and imminent danger.

      In the absence of that kind of danger, a firearm being present introduces some increased risk (decreased safety).

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 小时前

      The proper regulations are removing firearms from situations, not making the guns themselves safer.