I had asked it to compare him and Hitler using only historical evidence and no conspiracies, it didn’t have new info so I fed it an article explaining the executive orders and it kept talking about it like a fictional scenario.
Isn’t most LLMs trained on older data? So it thinks you are talking about the last election
This is true. But it also is stating that it knows Trump did not win a second term, insinuating it has data past the election.
There needs to be a lot more transparency in what the models are actually based on and what is being artificially filtered or limited.
He didn’t win a second term in 2020. The data is clearly from around then.
Ah that’s true. Hadn’t considered that it would be pulling from before the latest election cycle entirely.
Yeah, most LLMs are about 12 to 18 months behind.
I mean his presidency is a month old, and his election win is still just three months old, whereas his loss is four years old. That is a pretty significant difference. In the current AI craze 4+ year old stuff is ancient, while a ~3 month old model is not terribly out of date yet (other than current world events, obviously).
First, telling people about an interaction with an AI is like telling them about that weird dream you had, nobody really cares.
Second, any AI has a training cutoff date, meaning they don’t know about any event that happened after they were created.
Finally, do you think you’re saying something here that hasn’t been said a thousand times over already?
I’ve had some pretty interesting weird dreams, and have captivated audiences with my retellings.
But yeah, talking about bullshit excreted by a bullshit generator isn’t interesting.
Ask the limit date for its training data and you’ll know why this happens
