• Shopro@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago
    Change since the previous day, day range averages and total all time
    Category Change 7d 14d 30d Total
    Personnel +650 677.1 706.4 609.7 460.0 (222650)
    Tanks +7 8.3 8.7 7.6 8.3 (4013)
    APVs +12 16.6 14.8 11.9 16.1 (7783)
    Artillery +21 21.1 19.5 20.5 8.1 (3941)
    MLRS +2 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.3 (617)
    Anti-aircraft Systems +1 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.8 (376)
    Aircraft - - - 0.1 0.6 (314)
    Helicopters +1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.6 (307)
    UAVs +10 15.0 14.6 17.5 7.1 (3438)
    Missiles - 2.1 3.1 5.6 2.5 (1214)
    Warships / Boats - - - - 0.04 (18)
    Other Vehicles +11 24.6 21.0 17.6 13.8 (6678)
    Special Equipment - 2.9 2.8 3.5 1.1 (539)
    Change since the previous day, total losses for day ranges and total all time
    Category Change 7d 14d 30d Total
    Personnel +650 4740 9890 18290 222650
    Tanks +7 58 122 229 4013
    APVs +12 116 207 357 7783
    Artillery +21 148 273 615 3941
    MLRS +2 13 22 50 617
    Anti-aircraft Systems +1 12 21 49 376
    Aircraft - - - 2 314
    Helicopters +1 6 8 10 307
    UAVs +10 105 204 525 3438
    Missiles - 15 43 168 1214
    Warships / Boats - - - - 18
    Other Vehicles +11 172 294 528 6678
    Special Equipment - 20 39 106 539

    Source: The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

    • NotaLLM@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Boy I sure wish data was this accurate and available, but even putting biases and agendas aside, even the most good-faith report could not produce accurate numbers. The fog of war is very real and it’d be nearly impossible to always assess whether a Russian IFV was “destroyed” or merely disabled and will eventually be repaired and back in action.

      Sure would be great data crunching to actually have these real numbers though.

      • Xeelee@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There OSINT casualty numbers that are considerably lower. But those are only for visually confirmed losses.