And yet, the most terrifying part? Donald Trump, the supposed strongman at the heart of it all, is oblivious. He has no grand ideological project beyond his own power. He does not understand the system being built around him, nor the fact that his own presidency is merely a vehicle for forces that see him as a useful, temporary battering ram against democracy.
But those around him? They understand perfectly.
This is not a technocracy: it’s not about expertise in a given area that decides leadership, but about plutocratic autocracy. I wouldn’t say ‘the rich’ are naturally the experts.
Yeah if you take the concept at face value it doesn’t sound like the worst idea.
It would need a lot of guardrails but it’s at least better than monarchy. I’d argue it would obviously devolve into a plutocracy basically immediately but that’s better than right from the start I guess.
I agree with you in that technocracy has a lot of potential and definitely sounds appealing, but I think it’d almost have to be socialist - both to atleast somewhat prevent the plutocratic devolution you speak of, as well as halting anti-intellectualism (‘you don’t need an education’) and post-truth (like you see with American social media now).
Then again, not having a free market would also require new guardrails (how do you ensure proper distribution beyond the formal mathematics?), which makes it more complicated.
Always better than a monarchy though.