At the current rate of horrible fiery deaths, FuelArc projects the Cybertruck will have 14.52 fatalities per 100,000 units — far eclipsing the Pinto’s 0.85. (In absolute terms, FuelArc found, 27 Pinto drivers died in fires, while five Cybertruck drivers have suffered the same fate, at least so far.)

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 小时前

    Do you realize how fucking insane that is? From 1921 to 1951 the rate of auto deaths dropped by around 50%, and from 1921 to 2011 the rate dropped by 90%. This is not just due to regulations on cars and pedestrian travel, but also in very large part due to crash safety in cars that steadily improved. With crash safety becoming a science, and crash test dummies being invented, and crumple zones, and air bags and seatbelts and the laws thereof.

    Musk, asshole motherfucker that he is, is trying to destroy all of that.

    • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 小时前

      Absolutely! What’s weird is that Teslas have been top-rated for crash-worthiness in the past, so there are a few possibilities I can think of:

      • They need to be top crash-worthy, because of the stupid autopilot trying its best to kill the occupants
      • They need to be top crash-worthy, because otherwise any crash at all would result in a fiery death
      • The Cybertruck is an outlier and is not as crash-worthy as the previous Teslas
      • All of the above

      What was that rule of thumb for taking multiple choice tests? If you don’t know the answer, always select “all of the above”?