i.e. If anyone has heard of the allegations against me and is convinced of them even without both perspectives, they can make a bet with me.
Conditions of such a bet: The people who think I am guilty of what I am accused of will give me a week to negate at least 50% of the claims which I am known to say are false. If I lose, I must donate $1521 dollars to someone in medical need and show it before continuing to make money for myself. If I win, those who agree to the bet must do the same thing.
Anyone up for this?
You say that around me and those who even suggest things might not be as everyone assumes, but then you imply otherwise around the people making the claims, as most people you claim to speak for imply about themselves. Which, along with the fact this idea is the response to the fact nobody has asked me for my perspective or reasons (which is an annoying trend at this point), is the reason for this now. It is an innocent way of going about it that has a productive outcome. What are you, anti-socialism? Rather than allow this to become something and for me to prove I’m a woman of my word through honoring a bet rather than some narcissist who finds her way out of things, you’d rather be sadistic with a remark about popcorn while trying to play doctor and say that amoral aspects about me confirm narcissistic tendencies? One shouldn’t lie to themself.