Summary

JD Vance argued that courts cannot overrule Trump’s executive orders, likening judicial interference to an illegal overreach.

Critics, including lawmakers and legal experts, denounced his claims as unconstitutional.

This debate follows recent federal rulings blocking Trump’s executive actions, including spending freezes and an order ending birthright citizenship.

Opposition figures warned against undermining the judiciary, emphasizing checks and balances.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Its like saying the president can do anything they want, and “the people” can’t do anything about it.

    At this point there is nothing that can be done but mass US wide protests.

    The government works for the people, when it stops doing that its no longer a government, but a dictatorship.