• The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Tldw: guy tests the RX 6800 at 1080p, 1440p and 4k across 19 games on Windows 11 vs Nobara 41.

    Allegedly, nobara beats windows on all games except 2 (witcher 3 and CS2), across almost all resolutions, by around single digit percents.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This is what I came for. The fact it’s close and reading blows is good enough for me.

      I have a steam deck and I’ve been impressed. Linux gaming has come a long way.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Also: This was on kernel 6.11, which does not have the new NTSYNC driver (coming in 6.14). It’s going to get even better soon.

      CS2 was tested on proton, but CS2 runs natively. It’s not a useful comparison.

      Edit: Someone pointed out that Nobara has already manually backpatched NTSYNC into its kernel.

      • flubba86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Nobara uses a custom kernel with lots of performance tweaks and wine-compatibility patches. It has had NTSYNC for almost a year already. Also, NTSYNC is not much faster than FSYNC, that many kernels and distros (including SteamOS) have been using since 2021.

      • Artyom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I used to play CSGO on both Windows and Linux for a while, and Linux always outperformed Windows by a solid margin. It wasn’t even close, I never even thought to try running it through Proton.

      • Vash63@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        NTsync won’t change much for performance compared to Nobara with Proton. Proton has used esync and fsync for many years now which provide similar performance, but with flaws that prevent them from being upstreamable to Wine. NTSync will allow upstream wine to match fsync performance and hopefully fix some bugs.

        • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          NTsync is not the same as Fsync, it allows for kernel acceleration of NT sync primitives, increasing speed over current wine/Proton builds.

          • Vash63@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            It’s not the same, but it provides similar performance. The performance gains are being compared to stock wine, not to Proton with esync or fsync.