• Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It’s not that the face is unbelievable, it’s the weird, high definition of the details compared to the rest of the photo. If it was 2015, I’d confidently say they copied a better quality picture of his face over this one.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Isn’t it just the thing that smartphones do these days where they slightly blur the background to make the person stand out more? Like you might do adjusting the focus, but faked.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Isn’t it just a regular shallow depth of field? You can see the piece of paper smoothly transition towards being in focus

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You might be right. Looking close up the edges don’t stand out as being faked, I just didn’t look that close before. Though the arm on the right (his left arm) is full in focus and the box right next to it is very out of focus.

          To be honest it’s been so long since I’ve seen a photo that wasn’t autocorrected up the wazoo that I can’t remember what things are supposed to look like anymore.