• Matt Blaze@federate.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    @djl I think a lot of what looks “correct” has to do with learned expectations. If you look at photos of architecture from, say, 100 years ago, the majority display carefully aligned vertical lines, because most cameras had movements that made that easy. As small cameras (without movements) became more common even in professional use, that expectation declined.

    • Matt Blaze@federate.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      @djl Also, if you look at *paintings* from the same period, you often see the opposite, with highly exaggerated perspective effects that photography of the time generally avoided. (See, for example O’Keeffe’s skyscraper paintings).