• Nora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’re an animal too.

    And yes, they are someones. They are sentient. Each individual has personality. Whether people acknowledge that or not does not make it not true.

    • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m a person. humans are animals, that is true, but we are distinct in important ways. denying this is dehumanizing.

      • Nora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, that is a speciesist take. We are not distinct in the ways that are most important. Among many similarities non-human animals feel pain and don’t want to die. Those are the most important ways that we are the same.

        Do you think humans evolved in a vacuum? We share a lot of similarities in our brains with other types of animals that also have brains.

        It is not dehumanizing. Here’s a quote to think on: “When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression”

        • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

          i’m not equal with animals. this is just more dehumanization.

        • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          that is a speciesist take

          speciesism is rational. i wouldn’t ask an elephant to engage in a discussion on lemmy.

          • Nora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Speciesism is not rational. I’m assuming you would not apply the same standards to a human that had the same intelligence as a chicken?

            Say we had a person with the same intelligence of a chicken. Would it be okay to milk them and use them for their milk? Or to use any part of them for ourselves? To eat them?

        • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          non-human animals feel pain and don’t want to die.

          we don’t know that any non-human animal understands personal mortality, so we need to clear up an ambiguity in your syntax there. the don’t even know if they know they colud die. if you don’t know you could want something, to say that you don’t want it is almost tautological. we can’t say teher is any evidence they want not to die, though.

                  • Nora@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    14 hours ago

                    It’s more than enough. You go there in person and try and kill one of those cows or chickens and watch them run away and then you tell me straight to my fucking face that they Don’t have a desire to live/ not die.

    • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      you are using an expansive definition of “someone” that most people don’t recognize and most disagree with.

      • Nora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most people thought slavery was okay at a certain point in time… Just because most people think something doesn’t make it right.