• ShepherdPie@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The “they feel like it” would be for the next time not this situation. This is why it is important to nit create bad precedents like this

    Considering the GOP is so good about following “precedent?” How absurd. This law is specific to NY so what other states are you referring to when you claim that other governors might do this too?

    • RowRowRowYourBot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do you think rule of law should only be maintained when both of the two major parties supports it?

      Do you think Hochul is going to win reelection? Do you think she will never be replaced? The precedent is for the NY governors that follow her. Wasn’t that obvious?

        • RowRowRowYourBot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Removing him without the opportunity to defend himself is NOT the rule of law.

            • RowRowRowYourBot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              He needs to be provided that opportunity before being removed as the law states. He isn’t defending himself in the press. There needs to be some form of inquiry or trial.

              How is this so hard for people to figure out? If you get accused of something you have the right to defend yourself.