Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 小时前Scientists move to Bluesky, transitioning away from X and Meta platformswww.dailyuw.comexternal-linkmessage-square112fedilinkarrow-up1938arrow-down115
arrow-up1923arrow-down1external-linkScientists move to Bluesky, transitioning away from X and Meta platformswww.dailyuw.comSunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 小时前message-square112fedilink
minus-squaresudoer777@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·10 小时前Probably because it has an algorithm
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·9 小时前This. Many people like stuff getting recommending to them algorithmically.
minus-squaremerdaverse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 小时前Exactly. I’ve curated my Mastodon feed way more than Bsky, and still, it’s incredibly boring. Great if you want to use socials less. It also tends to overvalue new stuff, so whoever screams the most occupies the most space in the feed.
minus-squarenotsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 小时前tech and age, need for investment. fediverse is complicated for scientists not doing computer sciency stuff senior researchers are less flexible with new tech, so similarity w twitter means they don’t have to learn a new system Already present audience means there’s little risk in investing time in BS.
Probably because it has an algorithm
It doesn’t though.
This.
Many people like stuff getting recommending to them algorithmically.
Exactly. I’ve curated my Mastodon feed way more than Bsky, and still, it’s incredibly boring. Great if you want to use socials less.
It also tends to overvalue new stuff, so whoever screams the most occupies the most space in the feed.
tech and age, need for investment.