• nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I just looked at their Privacy Policy/ToS.

    EDIT: Accidentally hit post.

    Anyway, based on their terms, the customer data is definitely the actual product. In addition, the wording makes it seem likely that the de-identification is pretty weak.

    Further details that should give anyone pause.

    Admitting to not respecting “Do Not Track” signals, because they are not legally required to:

    Mention of collecting data about gender at birth, whether one regularly sleeps with a partner, and menstrual cycle regularity:

    These guys are creepy as fuck, without even getting to the possible backdoor. They are selling customer data with a contractual pinky-swear to not re-identify the data (this being mentioned, to me, means that there is a plausible means to do so). So.

    What kind of creepiness could this data be used for?

    • Potential for blackmail/kompromat. (using sensors to detect patterns of sexual activity that could be infidelity or “sexual deviancy”)

    • Targeting people who may have had abortions.

    • Signs of not following religious doctrine (premarital sex, sex for purpose other than procreation, etc)

    • Checking whether the person is home and likely sleeping.

    • Spying on employees during their off-work hours (not that it’s ok during work hours) and/or scrutinizing sick leave.

    There are a lot more possibilities. Way too dystopian and creepy.

    • Ghyste
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Sounds like they’re from Texas.

      Edit: Nope. New York somehow.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Trash company with a trash CEO. Until we start treating digital privacy on the same level as physical privacy, this sort of stuff will continue.