• RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    They cannot possibly assure customers that remote devs aren’t using copilots to help them code.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Generative AI is a technology that can create pictures, movies, audio (music or voice action) and writing using artificial intelligence

      By their definition of Gen AI, it’s unclear to me if the label says anything about code. I’m not sure I would consider it “writing.”

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This might be a little off-topic, but I’ve noticed what seems to be a trend of anti-AI discourse ignoring programmers. Protect artists, writers, animators, actors, voice-actors… programmers, who? No idea if it’s because they’re partly to blame, or people are simply unaware code is also stolen by AI companies—still waiting on that GitHub Copilot lawsuit—but the end result appears to be a general lack of care about GenAI in coding.

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I think it’s because most programmers use and appreciate the tool. This might change once programmers start to blame gen AI for not having a job anymore.

          • takeda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I noticed a bad trend with my colleagues who use copilot, chatgpt etc. They not only use it to write code, but also trust it with generally poor design decisions.

            Another thing is that those people also hate working on existing code, claiming it is communicated and offering to write their (which also ends up complicated) version of it. I suspect it’s because copilot doesn’t help as much when code is more mature.

          • mke@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            There remains a significant enclave that rejects it, but yeah, it’s definitely smaller than equivalent groups in other mentioned professions. Hopefully things won’t get that far. I think the tech is amazing, but it’s an immense shame that so many of my/our peers don’t give a flying fuck about ethics.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              There remains a significant enclave that rejects it, but yeah, it’s definitely smaller than equivalent groups in other mentioned professions.

              Reporting in.

              I think the tech is amazing, but it’s an immense shame that so many of my/our peers don’t give a flying fuck about ethics.

              Yup. Very much agreed here. There are some uses that are acceptable but it’s a but hard to say that any are ethical due to the ethically bankrupt foundations of its training data.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Indie studio teams are pretty small so its possible, I personally hate that the word copilot ever even appears and never ever autogen code, but moreso I’m sure the stamp refers to art, texture, and sound.