It’s brief, around 25:15

https://youtube.com/watch?v=nf7XHR3EVHo

If you’ve been sitting on making a post about your favorite instance, this could be a good opportunity to do so.

Going by our registration applications, a lot of people are learning about the fediverse for the first time and they’re excited about the idea. I’ve really enjoyed reading through them :)

        • Zagorath@lemm.eeEnglish
          2·
          22 minutes ago

          IMO bridgy is not well designed. The fact that it requires both the follower and the followee to specifically opt in basically makes it DOA. Both Mastodon and BlueSky are completely open and public in terms of post visibility, so bridgy should have been designed to require explicit opt outs from anyone who didn’t want their content bridged.

          • Natanael@infosec.pubEnglish
            1·
            10 minutes ago

            Bridgy started without that requirement and it pissed off too many Mastodonians so they reworked it

    • rumba@lemmy.zipEnglish
      9·
      6 hours ago

      I’m really not happy about bluesky their fragmentation of the fediverse protocols

      shrug, I wish they were with us, but they are also a big ole corporate entity, so I’m kind ok with us staying our our side of the fence. As they need to implement payment and corporate protections to their network, we’re free to be free over here.

      is only going to harm us in the long run.

      We don’t have to play ball. not with them anyway,

      I think, If we have any credible threat, it’s going to be from the Governmental gross anti-tampering laws, forced moderation, or backup regulations. They could make it legally difficulty for us to exist.

    • Dil@is.hardlywork.ingEnglish
      41·
      7 hours ago

      Bluesky was always twitters goal, they were losing hella money, so they devloped blue sky.