• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Now is a great time to criticize them for their past actions and current attitudes, but a poor time to expect protection from them, on account of their minority position in the government.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      38 minutes ago

      but a poor time to expect protection from them

      Where did this “protection” idea come from?

      No one expects “protection”, we expect them to lift a finger to do the job they were sent to washington to do, or get the eff out of the way and let someone with a spine and some morals get it done. The only one out there doing the job is sanders and the progressives. All the other dems only came together to vote for tougher laws on illegal video streaming sites, and now they are pushing to gut peoples protection to say what they want online.

      https://www.techdirt.com/2025/02/21/while-democracy-burns-democrats-prioritize-demolishing-section-230/

      and back in jan: https://politics.slashdot.org/story/25/01/30/028201/democrat-teams-up-with-movie-industry-to-propose-website-blocking-law

      They are doing nothing but what their donors want, as usual. They learned nothing and continue to do nothing.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        No one expects “protection”, we expect them to lift a finger to do the job they were sent to washington to do,

        What were they sent to Washington to do, again?

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          Dont make me pull out school house rock videos of how our supposed “democracy” works.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            34 minutes ago

            They were sent to Washington to participate in the legislature. I could go for several more details here, but the core of it comes down to - they were sent to Washington to protect the rights and interests of their constituents through the passage and restriction of laws.

            ie ‘protection’.