Thanks everyone for your active participation here. We knew this would have a lot of interest and so we’ve waited to dive into the conversation because we see some themes emerging that I’ll respond to broadly here. The main concerns I’m noting are around the license agreements we declare, our use of data for AI, and our Acceptable Use Policy. Below are a few clarifications to each of these areas.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    We. Don’t. Want. AI.

    Great, what other good Gecko Engine Browsers are there?

    • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Waterfox is the safe bet, it’s basically just regular Firefox repacked with better defaults and telemetry turned off, but it isn’t harden or has add-ons included.

      LibreWolf is what I switched to over a year ago, The team behind it have been pretty thorough in scraping out spyware and it comes pre-hardened out the box (but that can break more invasive websites).

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re opt-in by default, it’s not like they’re forcing AI on you.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Even the mere existence of AI which usage is opt-in is a so called slippery slope.

        • simple@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Not really. Other companies forced AI to appeal to investors and look for new ways to trap consumers in subscriptions. Mozilla added free, privacy-friendly addons because people asked for it. Big difference.

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            We’re already seeing other companies shoehorn in chatbots into everything to try to make up for the fact that the trend didn’t really catch on.

        • TriflingToad
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          idk why people are downvoting, it’s exactly what has happened with literally every bad policy online anywhere. They beta test it to gauge how bad backlash would be, then if it’s acceptable go ahead with it, if too much backlash just use the “oh it was just a beta! we would never do that 🥺” excuse then in 6 months try again

          Edit: the Lemmy hive mind has reversed their decision. It was at +4 | -4 when I replied

          • simple@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Because they said multiple times they don’t plan on making it a default. From the very beginning Mozilla announced their AI extensions will not be forced on people. I don’t understand the “but what if they do” comments. “What if elon musk bought firefox?!??! It could happen!”

            • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Also said “we will never share your data” and now they’ve removed that from the terms. I assume you’re aware that they just had a change in leadership? These decisions come from whichever is in charge. New leadership might still agree enough with it to not change it, but what about the person after, or the one after that? As they say “never is a very long time”.

              I’m also not saying it will definitely happen, but my confidence in it not happening is now low enough that I switched to LibreWolf.