I don’t think that’s set in stone. The new gonservätïve commission is rather focused on not being too firm or too prescriptive, on the mistaken theory that that gives better results than doing proper research in finding the best approaches before handing out money.

The choices are probably still the usual:

• batteries and “clean” hydrogen for the short range
• SAF (sustainable aviation fuel), i.e. kerosene analogs that are either plant-/animal-/waste-based or are e-fuels created from captured carbon and “clean” hydrogen