This is a link to a diff of Firefox where the FAQ are stored in a structured way. In the diff it can be seen that the question “Does Firefox sell your personal data?” has been removed:

        {  
            "@type": "Question",  
            "name": "Does Firefox sell your personal data?",  
            "acceptedAnswer": {  
                "@type": "Answer",  
                "text": "Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from  
                        many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed  
                        to protect your privacy. That’s a promise. "  
            }  
        },  

People in the comments are asking if the definition of the word “neven” has been changed or what’s going on.

  • fuzzywombat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Trust is extremely fragile and fleeting. Looks like Mozilla dropped it on the ground and it shattered into million pieces. Oh well, it was nice while it lasted. So long and thanks for all the fish.

  • Grapho@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    This is what happens when you spend millions a year to get a fucking MBA or a lawyer as your CEO.

    Should we fire the CEO to keep the workers and advocacy as intact as possible now that Google might be pulling out finding? Nah, let’s do mass layoffs, enshittify a supposed non-profit and keep the mfs that put us here in the first place.

  • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    I keep seeing librewolf mentioned, so I’ve begun making the switch.

    Is it possible to copy a profile over so sessions/tabs continue? Just curious. I am a tab hoarder.

  • Nighed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is there any way to actually have an effect of Firefox strategy? If they were a public company you could buy shares etc?

    • Gerudo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Usage statistics would be the only way tbh. No users means they would need to reconsider policies.

    • plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well shit. Guess I really have to ditch Mozilla. They make a great product and had a great mission - also generated a heap of revenue. But I guess why settle for good money when you could sell out your principles (and our data) in the pursuit of More Money🤦‍♂️

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        But I guess why settle for good money…

        They’ve been almost completely reliant on money from Google for over a decade. It’s a tenuous situation and it’s entirely possible that this money will be gone when the Google antitrust lawsuit is done. If Mozilla loses that revenue then it’s basically game over for them.

        We don’t have to like it but Mozilla needs a new way to be funded and the options are limited.

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Funding wouldn’t be such an urgent matter were they not paying exorbitant salaries and bonuses out the ass to the people responsible for putting all their eggs into the Google basket in the first place, not to mention consultant fees to this that and the other.

  • HexPat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Does anyone have suggestions for either an app or desktop browser that will work on an iPad?

      • vandsjov@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        But they can still behave differently. Some stuff might not work on Safari, that Edge will open with no problems. Also, all the stuff that’s NOT the rendering engine can be something else than Safari.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Except that isn’t really the case unless the website is behaving differently do to the user agent. Apple prohibits any extensions or thing else like that.

          • vandsjov@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            What about browsers that removes ads - wouldn’t that be changing of the website?