I just find it very weird that you are saying something is a moped because it’s chainless when most mopeds, and motorized bicycles have chains.
It’s the other way around: I am saying that both chain-driven and chainless mopeds validly exist – because different definitions of “moped” exist – so to disqualify something as a moped because it is chainless is not always valid. Kindly do not twist the causality of what I’ve written.
It’s the other way around: I am saying that both chain-driven and chainless mopeds validly exist – because different definitions of “moped” exist – so to disqualify something as a moped because it is chainless is not always valid. Kindly do not twist the causality of what I’ve written.
That’s LITERALLY what you said!
And all I said is it’s weird because most—and I said most—mopeds have chains.