• blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    As far as I know, the lawyers have not confirmed that it is him.

    But in any case, that’s beside the point of the “weird ass conspiracy”. To spell it out a bit more clearly, the actual idea is that there is “not enough evidence” to convict - because he should not be convicted. (In a jury trial, you cannot just say “guilty, but should be unpunished”; but you can say “not guilty, due to insufficient evidence”.)