• hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I think you’re describing SMS passcode, totp or other such factors.

    Passcode doesn’t require phone necessarily, but you can use it too

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      A lot of the stuff that has implemented passkeys so far are on mobile. And I mean the apps serving them out, not things you authenticate to.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        BitWarden has a desktop extension and it also handles 2FA. No reason to be using a password, which is way less secure and can be extracted from a website DB via a hack.

          • perfectly_boiled_pizza@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            In practice, yes. IF IMPLEMENTED PROPERLY it would be extremely unlikely for an attacker to get in.

            For example with a proper implementation of TOTP it would require an attacker to guess the correct number between 1 and a million in less than a minute. Most services make you wait a little bit (often less than humans notice) between attempts and don’t allow infinite attempts, so an attacker would have to be unimaginably lucky.

            There are sadly lots of huge companies that DON’T IMPLEMENT 2FA PROPERLY. Sony Entertainment (account for PlayStation) for example. So a unique and long password is still important.