There’s no removed comments. I looked through my profile cause like sometimes I just be saying shit so I was okay maybe. But I can’t find any comments on that community. Just the old 196.

Idk if this is where to post this but I just wanted to rant. It’s my first time ever being banned so it felt ouch.

        • LittleRatInALittleHat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          So what about all the people who were banned from blahaj back in december for dissent?

          What 196 are they supposed to use?

          Literally the biggest poster on 196 was banned and was forced to move over to .world despite them saying they are ok with Neopronouns. And everyone just called them a TERF instead of listening to them.

          From my perspective that is not really an inclusive community concerned with protecting LGBTQ people, it’s blatant suppression of dissent.

          Most people who were banned for “Gatekeeping” then and since then were really just banned because the admins didn’t like them despite them dispite not breaking rules.

          You keep posting numbers, but you then ignore the dedicated base for the world community that is not going away.

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            So what about all the people who were banned from blahaj back in december for dissent?

            No one was banned for dissent. People were banned for gatekeeping, misgendering and repeatedly and/or deliberately misgendering folk.

            Most people who were banned for “Gatekeeping” then and since then were really just banned because the admins didn’t like them despite them dispite not breaking rules.

            The rule is don’t misgender and gatekeep other folks and block or ignore them if you can’t deal with their identity or pronouns. The modlog is right there. If you can find a single instance of someone getting banned without breaking that or another rule, I want to know about it

            • LittleRatInALittleHat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              So nobody was banned for dissent, but you will unban people who were banned for Gatekeeping because they weren’t actually Gatekeeping?

              So if they weren’t banned for dissent or Gatekeeping, what was the reason?

              I let them know, but this is really inconsistent policy

              • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 days ago

                The only people who were banned were gatekeeping other folks identities. If you find an example of someone that was banned who didn’t do that, I will unban them.

                If you find that inconsistent or confusing, I’m not sure what to tell you…

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            the biggest poster on 196 was banned for saying “i respect neopronouns BUT your policy of not allowing harassment for neopronouns isn’t for me and so i am preemptively leaving” while screaming stuff about how dragons aren’t real instead of just blocking and reporting offensive users as the mods explicitly asked.

            to clarify. it’s a bit worse than you express. :)

              • spujb@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                nope, clarified some other details in an edit thanks for holding me accountable

              • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Question: If we found the skeletal remains of a dragon in east asia somewhere, would you then be fine with ‘dragon’ as a neo-pronoun?

                You seem to think this is self-evidently obvious.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Question: If we found the skeletal remains of a dragon in east asia somewhere, would you then be fine with ‘dragon’ as a neo-pronoun?

                  At no point have I fought anyone on neopronouns.

                  But no, dragons not being real is compounded by the fact that human beings, by definition, are not dragons, in the same way that human beings are not attack helicopters. But apparently at some point that turned from “Attack Helicopter Gender is conservative talking point nonsense” to “You must respect Attack Helicopter Gender”

                  You seem to think this is self-evidently obvious.

                  Jesus fucking Christ. Yes, it is obvious that dragons are not real. Thank you for reinforcing the utter disconnect from reality.

              • spujb@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                you’d be funny if you weren’t so sadly acerbic about this.

                You were quite clear that you regarded a cis person daring to express disagreement [NOT “dispute her rights”] with someone who is trans [about how to run a space she owns in order to mitigate hate speech against her own identity] as ‘entitlement’,

                ftfy.*

                that saying “dragons aren’t real” is “invalidating behavior”

                in this context, yes it absolutely was. i and the vast majority of 196 users stand by this.

                and that thinking [saying in the context of a trans woman asking you not to negatively engage with suspected trolls on the basis of their pronouns] that dragons aren’t real is a form of thoughtcrime [toxicity to a space already vulnerable to that kind of rhetoric] which expresses intent to not use neopronouns in the future

                ftfy

                *edited this to address your goalpost moving regarding expressing disagreement ~> disputing rights because i don’t care enough to merit you with a reply

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  *edited this to address your goalpost moving regarding expressing disagreement ~> disputing rights because i don’t care enough to merit you with a reply

                  Ah, too cowardly to put this as a response, I see - I might have seen it, after all. “about how to run a space” implies that I was at all disputing the rule. I wasn’t, and I’ve pointed this out before, as your disingenuous ass knows. At no point did I say “Blahaj shouldn’t be run like this!”; in fact, in the immediate aftermath, I said I understood the rationale, but it wasn’t for me. This, however, was far too direct a contradiction for the Blahaj administration to handle, and they removed it for ‘gatekeeping’.

                  And you continue to lick their boots for doing so. Bravissima.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  ftfy

                  about how to run a space she owns in order to mitigate hate speech against her own identity

                  Hey, you’re demonstrating the same level of illiteracy you did the first time! Remember when I pointed out that at no point did I dispute her right to run her instance the way she wanted? Good times!

                  But this level of disingenuity is par for the course for you.

                  in this context, yes it absolutely was. i and the vast majority of 196 users stand by this.

                  As seen elsewhere in this thread, the position of many Blahaj supporters likewise seems to be that the old conservative attack helicopter canard had a good idea going, actually, and we should be all-in on attack helicopter gender too.

                  ftfy

                  “Dragons aren’t real is a form of toxicity” isn’t really a better look. You do understand that, right?

                  … right…?

          • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            You seem to know a lot about the whole story for a 20 days old account.

            Literally the biggest poster on 196 was banned and was forced to move over to .world

            1. Who was that?
            2. If that happened indeed as you describe it, how is this supposed to justify moving the whole community without the members asking first?

            dedicated base for the world community

            The two people who posted there in the last 24 hours?

            https://lemmy.world/c/196?dataType=Post&sort=New

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              So what about all the people who were banned from blahaj back in december for dissent?

              What 196 are they supposed to use?

              • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                They should open a thread here documenting Why their ban was a power trip.

                Two possible outcomes

                1. Ada was power tripping and unbans them
                2. Their bans were deserved

                If there was already such a post, feel free to link to it, sorry if I don’t remember, it’s been a while to be honest

            • LittleRatInALittleHat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I have to uae burners because I don’t want my main account banned from blahaj from them lurking here

              I’ve talked with them and why they post there every day deapite the other communities existing, and that’s what they said.

              From what I can tell that whole community is there because of the christmas ban wave, most of them are trans people who said they never gatekept and respect Neopronouns.

              They also said you specifically lurk these threads and resort to personal attacks against people who crtique blahaj, like pointing at account age instead of engaging in good faith with the people who got banned from blahaj admin abuse.

              • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                You still haven’t told me who was that main poster who was banned.

                Not sure who is the one not engaging in good faith in this conversation.

                • LittleRatInALittleHat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  After asking if I could share they said they don’t want their main account getting banned from blahaj in retaliation.

                  I’m sorry

                  • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    But you said they were already banned back in December. I’m just asking for the banned account, it should publicly displayed in the modlog.

                    I’m not asking for their new alt.

                  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    If someone back then was banned for gatekeeping or misgendering and won’t do that anymore, not only will they not be banned in “retaliation”, their banned account will be unbanned. All they need to do is reach out to me

                    If someone back then was banned for gatekeeping and misgendering, but didn’t do those things, not only will they not be banned in “retaliation”, their banned account will be unbanned. All they need to do is reach out to me.

                    If someone back then was banned for gatekeeping and misgendering and they don’t reach out to me, I still I won’t ban their new account if I become aware of it, because the point of all of this is to make it clear that gatekeeping and misgendering are not on. If they’re not doing that on their second account, their second account won’t get banned, because the first ban achieved its purpose.

                    tl;dr - Whoever they are, if they’re not gatekeeping and misgendering folk, they’ll be fine.

        • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh yes, that’s why I’m the one keeping alive

          Also, if the LW community team could avoid mower tripping to try to xintimidate" me when I post elsewhere than LW or whatever that was: https://lemmy.world/post/24489154

          They also admitted that they consider Federation to be a “divorce feature” and that the best experience is centralized

          Federation is a feature like divorce is a feature. It’s extremely important that it exists and is accessible. Not everybody needs to do it. Other servers are a fine option if you know what you’re doing and are willing to deal with more issues OR if there’s a compelling reason (such as the various regional servers).

          https://lemmy.world/comment/14933488

          I respect the sysadmins work, but some people in the LW community should really reassess their stance towards centralization and other instances.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Oh yes, that’s why I’m the one keeping alive

            hahaha gottem XD

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Also, if the LW community team could avoid mower tripping to try to xintimidate" me when I post elsewhere than LW or whatever that was: https://lemmy.world/post/24489154

            When you have a long history of starting shit with .world, your actions will increasingly be interpreted in a negative light - including when you don’t mean them to be negative.

            They also admitted that they consider Federation to be a “divorce feature” and that the best experience is centralized

            Federation is a feature like divorce is a feature. It’s extremely important that it exists and is accessible. Not everybody needs to do it. Other servers are a fine option if you know what you’re doing and are willing to deal with more issues OR if there’s a compelling reason (such as the various regional servers).

            Okay?

            I respect the sysadmins work, but some people in the LW community should really reassess their stance towards centralization and other instances.

            Considering you are constantly picking fights with the comm team over the pettiest shit (and I don’t mean to give them a pass, considering they engage on said petty shit with equal vigor), gonna press X to doubt.

            • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              When you have a long history of starting shit with .world, your actions will increasingly be interpreted in a negative light - including when you don’t mean them to be negative.

              Is documenting power trips starting shit now?