The shitshow in the Whitehouse yesterday really brought it to light - the U.S. can no longer be trusted with our secrets. Its time to leave 5 eyes. I would create a new intelligence sharing union with the other 3 members, on condition that they also leave. Inviting France and other EU states might also make sense.

  • intelisense@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    I disagree - everything we send goes to Moscow. Everything we get comes from Moscow. There is no value for us. There’s nothing to lose by leaving.

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m afraid there is, because Trump’s vindictiveness won’t stop with intelligence! Tariffs would be just the start.

        • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes. Again, I did start my comment with ‘You’re right’. But it’s also the case that what you - and I - are advocating for would, in the short term, be a boon to terrorism and organised crime, and may well have knock on effects for the economy, too.

          My point is not that we shouldn’t do it, but that it would have massive, unpredictable consequences!

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Wow, this is like the country level of justifying staying with an abuser. If the USA is unreliable and insecure, because of trumps, but more because the American people voted him in and their government sees fit not to prevent the kind of issues he’s causing. Then it’s better to leave and face consequences, and retaliate appropriately now, than suffer and still face those same consequences later.

        • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, it isn’t, because the first thing I said was:

          You’re right

          And the rest of my comment simply pointed out that it would be complex and risky - which is true.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yes, but you’re discounting the fact that all intelligence is shared in the mean time. All large intergovernmental organisations are complex. The USA is likely compromised. Sharing data with them would undermine the new entity.