- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
At least 25 undercover police officers who infiltrated political groups formed sexual relationships with members of the public without disclosing their true identity to them, the Guardian can disclose.
The total shows how women were deceived on a systemic basis over more than three decades. It equates to nearly a fifth of all the police spies who were sent to infiltrate political movements.
One woman, known as Jacqui, has said her life was “absolutely ruined” after she discovered by chance that the father of her son was an undercover officer, more than 20 years after his birth. The officer, Bob Lambert, abandoned them when the son was an infant, claiming falsely that he had to go on the run abroad to escape being arrested by police.
Other women had intimate relationships lasting up to six years with men who concealed the fact they were undercover officers who had been sent to spy on them and their friends.
So when are they going to be tried for these rapes?
Pulling the rape trigger so easily diminishes what real rape survivors have been through. Is this a terrible crime. Yes. Is it that crime. No.
Technically it isn’t rape to have consensual sex while undercover. But it is shady af to have a bunch of kids while undercover, pretending to be someone else.
Very much feels like a loophole.
Is it legal for someone’s identical twin to pretend to be them in order to tick someone into sex?
It’s not illegal. Immoral, yes. Tricking someone into consensual sex is not rape. Heck, it’s called “dating.”
The sex is not the problem, it’s that they did it without protection and had kids. And still, is that an illegal act? Certainly they should not keep their jobs. But what if they’re really good at their job?
I really don’t like humans very much.