• PsychedSy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Product design and BOM. Less parts. Easier to integrate. Easier IP ratings.

    • Dog@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you forgetting that the Galaxy S5 had a removable back and still had an IP rating?

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Watches can be waterproof to hundreds of meters deep and they have removable backs. It’s not about the waterproofing, it’s about not letting you change the battery so you have to buy a whole new phone when the battery stays dying. It’s forced obsolescence.

        • Dog@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yet they still did it. So regardless if it’s easier or not, they can still do it that way.

      • PsychedSy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you saying it’s not easier to just not have a hole than it is to seal a hole?

        I’m not thrilled about it either, but it’s obvious why they prefer it.

        • Dog@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They need microphones and speakers. There’s gonna be holes regardless.

          • PsychedSy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah. But you remove the sim card assembly (BOM), connector/solder pads (system design and internal space) and remove potential ingress points. It’s just easier and cheaper from engineering through to production.

            • MaximumPower@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Dude, they have under water cameras , you can swim with fucking whales with a huge ass cameras, I’m not going swimming with my phone. Fick all these ratings, it’s not like they would make it cheaper for you. Give me back changeable batteries, I’m not fucking fish.

              • PsychedSy
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’re chasing IP ratings. I like not losing a phone when I make a dumb, but prefer lightly sealed or unsealed with a replaceable battery. My LG V20 was the bees knees.

                • MaximumPower@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, and you can travel to space with a rocket. Common what kind of argument is that. You forgot the steps in between.

                  Thanks for sending me to space in this rocket, but how do I get home.

            • Dog@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Idk, apple replaced their sim card slot with… Plastic. A plastic insert. “Internal Space”

              • PsychedSy
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’re making SIM and non-SIM versions so that let’s them use the same tooling for both versions. It’s still a BOM reduction, but yeah, the other points would be a much smaller impact.

              • PsychedSy
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not entirely sure how much of a difference it would make in reality, but they’re probably doing it for a reason. Though, with google devices, they may just be trying to nudge other manufacturers in a direction for their own reasons. Google phones help them set and maintain certain standards without trying to force other manufacturers to do what they want.

                Is there a motive you see for Google to do this that isn’t per-unit cost savings?

                • Dog@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  As users in this discussion have said, Google just wants more control.