AI Summary:

Overview:

  • Mozilla is updating its new Terms of Use for Firefox due to criticism over unclear language about user data.
  • Original terms seemed to give Mozilla broad ownership of user data, causing concern.
  • Updated terms emphasize limited scope of data interaction, stating Mozilla only needs rights necessary to operate Firefox.
  • Mozilla acknowledges confusion and aims to clarify their intent to make Firefox work without owning user content.
  • Company explains they don’t make blanket claims of “never selling data” due to evolving legal definitions and obligations.
  • Mozilla collects and shares some data with partners to keep Firefox commercially viable, but ensures data is anonymized or shared in aggregate.
  • Jocker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mozilla is soo stupid!

    Most Firefox users use it only because of the values it upholds, and now they decided to destroy it. MF wouldn’t even have any any revenue once they betray their little existing users!

    If they’re throwing away their values, then there is no reason to use Firefox anymore, BECAUSE OBJECTIVELY FIREFOX IS INFERIOR TO CHROMIUM.

    And hopefully this accelerates development and support to fully alternate browsers.

    • verdigris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You’re not totally wrong here, but the fact is that these updates are a complete non-issue that has only resulted in so much backlash because of the self-selected Firefox audience of people who know enough about tech and privacy to care, but not enough to understand what’s actually threatening. The updates were a minor change in language that didn’t change the status quo, but idiots like the guy who thinks that incognito mode somehow stops a site from gathering information on you flock to these articles and start crying doomsday.

      Mozilla is the only big web company that’s even close to on the side of consumers and it’s sad to see them eat shit for no reason.

      • Jocker
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, that’s why google is paying millions to be the default.

            • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              OK I think I see what you’re saying now:

              If everyone leaves Firefox because of this, Google would probably stop paying them to be the default search engine.

              I don’t see that as the biggest issue though. Once people are leaving, my guess is they’re just going to stop maintaining firefox regardless of how much money they get from Google. Cause why maintain a browser literally no one uses, instead of figuratively.