- cross-posted to:
- conservative
- cross-posted to:
- conservative
Summary
A Senate bill to ban transgender women and girls from female sports teams failed to advance in a test vote, falling short of the 60 votes needed in a 51-45 party-line tally.
The bill sought to define Title IX protections based on reproductive biology at birth. Republicans argued it ensured fairness in women’s sports, while Democrats called it unnecessary and divisive.
Trump previously signed an executive order aligning federal policy with this view, and the NCAA changed its rules accordingly.
LGBTQ+ advocates condemned the bill as exclusionary.
I think it’s at least partly related to patriarchy. Same reason bisexual men and bisexual women are generally treated differently. Women are seen as much less of a “threat” to masculinity and generally more socially accepted (albeit more objectified & marginalized in different ways) in the patriarchal system. I think a lot of men use their attraction to women as “proof” to themselves that they’re not gay (and to them gay = feminine = bad), and the existence of bi men undermines their masculine foundation to an extent.
I think the underlying idea with trans people is “of course women would want to be men” whereas “a man who wants to be a woman” is disrupting the patriarchal logic of maleness being more desirable. The idea that a man could actually be a woman (and even take radical steps to affirm that) is more transgressive in a system that highly values male dominance.