• notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yup, the country whose infrastructure is getting obliterated does not profit from war.

    Care to elaborate on the South America/Africa part?

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well I’m mostly thinking they’re gonna benefit depending on how ignored they end up being in any potential conflict, as a consequence of not being in that conflict. That’s mostly speculation, I don’t have anything to actually back it up beyond my meanderings

      • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I see what you mean, benefitting through not getting involved. I can totally see that going for South America Unfortunately, Central Africa would get deeply pulled into such conflict given its vast rare earth resources, so I doubt they could benefit.

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, possibly. Either way hard to predict how such a hypothetical would end up. Maybe you’ll get stuff like china coming in and providing guarantees to Africa etc

          Either way, probably a mess

          • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            last time I visited West Africa there was an incredible amount of Chinese investment going in. With the US abandoning soft power, I can’t see how China wouldn’t use this vacuum to take over the US’s role.