• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    The party itself expects to just be the status quo and have people vote for it.

    When the alternative was Trump and Project 2025, that’s exactly what most should have voted for.

    But stopping DEI was more important than Social Security for the majority of voters

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Peope can’t afford their bills and the Democrats were out there saying the economy is stronger than ever. They had no intention of helping people and you are shocked that people didn’t go out to vote. If it’s damned if you do, damned if you don’t, most people will chose the latter

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They should at least have voted third party… I think many people should have voted third party… Why do so few people vote third party?

        • bishbosh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          If they are too apathetic to vote for dems, they certainly won’t go out of their way to make a statement and vote third party.

        • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          because voting third party is useless and only helps trump to win since you’re wasting your vote

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Still better than not voting at all. Would not give the same signal if republicans win with 40% of votes VS winning with more than 50% of votes.

            Additionally, if the regular voting base for third parties grows, it exponentially makes more sense voting third party.
            It is like driving backwards away from a really near wall where you parked sideways against it: you have to get just a bit closer to the wall with your nose, but as soon as the tail starts to get away from the wall, the distance grows exponentially faster over time.

            I think best for US would be alternative conservative parties besides republicans.

            • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              In a first past the post voting system like america has, third parties will never get a significant amount of votes. Even if they would get like 5%, which would be a lot for a third party (10 times the amount of the green party in 2024), it would make no difference whatsoever on the election outcome. Sure the winning party might have a smaller margin on the popular vote, but that’s totally irrelevant since you can win the election without a majority on the popular vote anyway.

              Then 5% of the population has wasted their vote, and if they’re smart they won’t repeat that mistake by the next election and make their vote actually matter. I don’t think the exponential thing works because people who voted third party will probably regret their decision as it leads to a win for the greater evil party.

              I agree that if you do not live in a swing state, your vote doesn’t really matter anyways and voting third party might make sense. However in general, voting a third party only makes sense when at least 1/3 of the population does the same, which is never gonna happen.

              The only way for America to get out of this two party competition, is to change the voting system and make it actually proportional like a real democracy. Obviously neither of the parties will ever change the system because it benefits them, so that change might require some significant events to happen…

              • Petter1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Well, you are right 😌 I’m just too optimistic, but that is a personal trait that I know I have 😸

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        It was stronger than under Trump. Everyone forgot they had to fight for toilet paper under Trump.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Only an absolute moron would believe that the economy was better in 2024 than in 2019 for your average person. You can’t blame the poor economy on Biden, but you can absolutely blame the DNC for not spputing off reforms to help people.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            You are one of those who forgot how bad it was. So many millions were in danger of eviction that moratoriums had to be passed.

            • BakerBagel@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Exactly. Moratoriums were passed. Absolutely nothing was done the past 2 years as prices for everything skyrocketed. People remember that sort of thing. Literally the forst thing Biden did was break his promise and give out stimulus checks that were nowhere near what he campaigned on.

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                He was able to bring inflation down, but the impacts were felt far and wide. As for stimulus checks those were written and voted on by Congress. Congress was Republican during Bidens presidency. He did sign executive orders to speed up the dispersal and to expand SNAP to try to help families. But if the people who fund the stimulus check (Congress) don’t fund it, there is nothing to give out.

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 days ago

                The economy recovered such that people were able to pay their rent despite the increases. Moratoriums ended yet mass evictions didn’t happen. People were doing far better than under Trump.

                • BakerBagel@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  People are paying their rent and buying groceries at the expense of everything else in their lives. You have your head buried in the sand if you actually believe people are better off than they were in 2019. Thats what voters remember, that’s why Harris lost. The last thing people who are struggling want to hear is that “inflation is going down. The economy is fine” when they can’t afford their necessities any more.

                  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    You have completely forgot that under Trump people couldn’t even pay their rent and groceries. It wasn’t “at the expense of everything else.” It was not even being able to pay rent much less anything else. It went to “I’ll be dead on the streets in a few months under Trump.” to “I can pay for rent and groceries but can’t save anything under Biden so Biden is worse.”

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I could be wrong about this: But I increasingly feel that the major issue for most of these people was economic instability - not making enough to make ends meet. But, out of a feeling of humiliation around saying “im poor” the message instead targets points of blame; either to potentially spare more dollars for themselves, or just genuinely to lash out at a world that’s succeeding without them.

      Doesn’t make the approach of their message in any way valid or okay. I’m just explaining that they needed an answer to their struggles. Trump gave them an elaborate lie about it, which to them was better than nothing.