• small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ok my mistake but that is just one example. They may exists some two similar community with different rules. I constantly read people opinions on the fediverse selling point was about it being censorship resistant because you can switch to another instance

        • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I constantly read people opinions on the fediverse selling point was about it being censorship resistant because you can switch to another instance

          It is, but that’s an emergency measure, not a day to day basis

        • threelonmusketeersM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          similar community with different rules.

          In those cases, the communities should not consolidate, and would not “follow each other” under Proposal 3.

          • small44@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            So the solution may only reduce the duplications but not fix it completely. A lot of communities are already dead with no active admins

            • threelonmusketeersM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              no active admins

              Admins or mods?

              If a community has no active mods, you can usually request it from the admins. If an instance has no active admins, it will probably shut down soon.