• Calcharger
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    If they don’t, there will be a heavy economic downturn. Whether you agree with student loans or not, the sudden return of monthly charges will be too much for millions of students to handle as they have already budgeted themselves based on student loan forgiveness and the student loan vacation. Defaults will certainly rise. Luxury purchases will go down. It will be an ugly winter.

    • dumples
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      It really shows how student debt is a shackle on an entire generation. I know most people are struggle without having to pay their monthly charges. With this long without any payments it really shows this amount of debt can be forgave without any real consequences.

    • @ImFresh3x
      link
      11 year ago

      That’s basically what is wanted in order to get inflation down to 2%. I mean, tax increases would be better, but that can’t happen with GOP controlling the house. So it’s awful shit like this, or raising rates which has already been done.

      I’m in no way for overturning student loan forgiven as btw.

  • dumples
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Fingers crossed that this goes through. Most people I know have student loans and any relief would be useful. Even though for most people it will be a drop in the bucket.

    • ViridianNottOP
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      $10,000 would actually eliminate debt for a lot of borrowers! IMO if $10,000 is a “drop in the bucket” you have a personal problem, not a political one.

      My girlfriend is a Pell grant recipient so she would get $20,000, and that wipes out more than half her pharmacy school debt

      • dumples
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I know it would do a lot for my household but there are people with 6 figure debts. I am glad that it is doubled for Pell Grants since those are more needs based. Its still a small portion for those who need it most

        • ViridianNottOP
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am just very weary of the idea that the government should use federal funds to bail out people who simply made poor decisions. Plenty of people get through college with a reasonable amount of debt, instead of some insane 6-figure total. Let me elaborate:

          My girlfriend is a graduate student with a family poor enough to qualify her for the Pell grant, and yet she will have less than 50k in debt when she graduates! Better yet, she only took out so much in loans because she knows that she can expect to earn a 6-figure salary with her pharmacy degree. Her pharmacy school costs $40,000 a year, and yet she is able to pay most of that money up front by working 30-hour weeks during the school year, and 50-hour weeks during the summer). It’s tough on her, but she has an incredibly bright future ahead because of the hard work.

          If you look at the demographics, the poorest people in our society - those who are food insecure and/or homeless, have a median of 0 DOLLARS of student loan debt. That’s because many of them were too poor to even consider college in the first place! Those with 6-figure debt are often members of the middle class who didn’t come up with a reasonable plan for paying what they owe based on their credentials, and didn’t take measures to reduce their loans during college. Instead of using federal funds on those people, I want it to go to someone who is truly in need.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            It costs the government nothing to forgive the debt as it’s debt they hold, they aren’t buying loans to forgive like some organizations. They’re all department of education loans the government always owned.

            • ViridianNottOP
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Not true. The money they receive from loan repayments is factored into the national budget, so forgiving loans means that the government has less money for other programs.

              It’s true that they’re not literally spending money here, but it’s the same end result.