• eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Unfortunately they don’t seem to understand that appearing ineffectual turns centrists off even more than appearing radical does.

    Does it though?

    Look at how much .world or reddit downvote and deride posts critical of Democrat behavior since the beginning on the election and the only takeaway you can get is that they’re in onboard with it no matter how much they hate it simply because Republicans are worse.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Okay, let me spell it out, yet again, since people still apparently don’t get it: making a tactical decision to avoid expressing criticism during an election is not the same thing as being perfectly happy with what the party is doing. It’s harm reduction, not agreement.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Harm reduction had led is to our first openly fascist President.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          No, in terms of proximate causes, failure to perform harm reduction did that.

          If you wanted to actually fix the Democrats’ neoliberal bullshit, the time for that was in 2021-early 2024, not fucking October! Screeching about third-parties in October was purely pro-fascist concern trolling.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That “tactical decision” enabled the democrats to sleepwalk into oblivion.

        The only way the democrats could have won the last election is if they stopped trying to be “reasonable republicans” and instead used every tool available to accomplish what their constituents want. Like what the republicans are doing, but for good things like women’s healthcare and not drowning migrant children in the Rio.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And there was exactly 0% chance of screeching “don’t vote for Kamala” in October accomplishing that, and everyone knew it. The only motivation for continuing to screech at that point was to concern troll in favor of Trump.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Nobody was screeching “don’t vote for Kamala”, we were telling Kamala what she needed to do to win. Instead she listened to the same campaign that killed Biden’s shot and we all lost because of it.

            Nothing I could have done would have made genocide popular. Nothing I could have done would have made Kamala pledging to build the wall and get tough on crime look like anything but an admission that Trump was right the whole time.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              we were telling Kamala what she needed to do to win

              No, you weren’t. Gaza was not the reason she lost.

    • newfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Look at how much .world or reddit downvote and deride posts critical of Democrat behavior since the beginning on the election

      Agreed, but why should we still presume that upvotes reflect genuine user opinion as opposed to astroturfing?

      It seems that lib-aligned groups use Reddit to manufacture approval for their clients. Given this, why should we view Reddit as a credible window into popular opinion? The entire site is an infomercial at this point

    • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Ok, but that’s a select group of people who choose to spend their free time typing about politics online. If you look at the actual election results, it would appear to back up the claim you’re quoting.

      • newfie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        that’s a select group of people

        Analyzing your query: It is indeed challenging to accurately verify if responses on Reddit originate from authentic human participants or sophisticated algorithmic entities. Therefore, the reliability of Reddit discourse as representative data remains uncertain.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I mean I usually post in world and not ml and I don’t get generally get downvoted for these opinions by anybody but pugjesus.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I’m not exactly sure, but from what I’ve heard you make your own instance and you can see who voted how with admin tools.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            i’m aware of this and it only makes me wonder at why the admins seemingly don’t bother to keep to track.

            • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Some do. You see some communities ban users that do nothing but downvote the communities posts from the all feed instead of just blocking them.

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          In those conversations it’s because each downvote is closely associated with a reply though there are ways to see I don’t actually use them. And I was mostly joking.

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Context to getting downvoted for demonstrating the Democrats ineffectualism to pugjesus? You’d know if you knew. He gets mad and says that everyone who didn’t have solidarity for him as a disabled person wanted to kill him. While he had no solidarity for Palestinians. We came from kbin together so me, him, and the late downpunxx had fun times. Sorry if I’m not entirely coherent, I’m drunk posting for the first time in over a year.