Zarlin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 23 hours agoGIMP 3.0 Releasedwww.gimp.orgexternal-linkmessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up1780arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1778arrow-down1external-linkGIMP 3.0 Releasedwww.gimp.orgZarlin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 23 hours agomessage-square143fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareShowroom7561@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 hours agoTaste aside, you can easily see what features Photoshop has, rather than guessing, right? I should have used a FOSS example, since Adobe is just bad in general (users saying the page has pop-ups, etc.).
minus-squareThe Menemen@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-25 hours agoAll I see is “Ooooh look, we use AI!” which actually repels me quite a lot. The page leaves the impression that photoshop is a toy, not a tool.
minus-squareShowroom7561@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 hours agoOk, let’s get off Adobe for a second… here’s a FOSS example: https://www.rawtherapee.com/ Easy to understand exactly what it does, screenshots are excellent. Surely, you can agree that this is better than how GIMP presents itself, right?
minus-squarenewfoundlandsteak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoGreat updated example and I look forward to hearing the arguments against this just like Adobe.
Taste aside, you can easily see what features Photoshop has, rather than guessing, right?
I should have used a FOSS example, since Adobe is just bad in general (users saying the page has pop-ups, etc.).
All I see is “Ooooh look, we use AI!” which actually repels me quite a lot. The page leaves the impression that photoshop is a toy, not a tool.
Ok, let’s get off Adobe for a second… here’s a FOSS example: https://www.rawtherapee.com/
Easy to understand exactly what it does, screenshots are excellent. Surely, you can agree that this is better than how GIMP presents itself, right?
Great updated example and I look forward to hearing the arguments against this just like Adobe.