• Owl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 小时前

    so its not even about sexualizing children, but even just containing children at all is forbidden now?

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 小时前

      The bill, which seeks to amend Chapter 43 of the Texas Penal Code by adding Section 43.235, defines an offense as knowingly possessing, accessing with intent to view, or promoting obscene visual material containing a depiction that “appears to be of a child younger than 18 years of age engaging in activities described by Section 43.21(a)(1)(B)“. The activities described by Section 43.21(a)(1)(B) refer to depictions of sexual conduct.

      It really depends how broadly it’s interpreted, but it is about sexual depictions of children.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 小时前

          How far should we take this? If someone labels the drawing below with “age 17”, is it time to call the cops?

          • Owl@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            16 小时前

            if you draw childporn, then yeah calling the cops would be perfect

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 小时前

              I’ve just never seen any good argument that there’s harm reduction in preventing drawings. To me it makes as much sense as banning drawn child murder.