• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I didn’t at first, then I went back and did.

    How do you think I got screenshots of the page without visiting the page, exactly? Please tell me, I’m fascinated to hear your explanation.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah that’s called inconsistency like I said.

      The point isn’t to screenshot it, it’s too use the bar resources of the aflcio, nlrb and BLS websites which provide pretty literally any statistics you’re curious about. Your laziness or inability to do research isn’t my concern, I’m not your teacher so I’m just going to point you in the right direction and how you can figure it out on your own. You apparently can’t or didn’t and instead want everyone to do the leg work for you so all you have to do is find some increasingly idiotic reason to say “Nuh uh” and provide no counter evidence.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You could’ve used any of the resources you mentioned to accesses the relevant statistics. Your laziness or inability to do research isn’t my concern, I’m not your teacher. You apparently can’t or didn’t want to find the information and instead want everyone to do the leg work for you so all you have to do is find some increasingly idiotic reason to say “Nuh uh” and provide no counter evidence.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You mean I could teach you how to do research but doing it for you. You won’t learn if entering is just handed to you. Critical thinking and moderate motivation would a answer every question you’ve posed including your modified version you’re claiming now.

          As for the rest.

          semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit

          You take the negative you bear the burden of evidence.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            You take the negative you bear the burden of evidence.

            Correct! I asked a question, you said no, therefore you bear the burden of evidence.

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              No you disagreed with the person a comment ahead then went on a tirade about people saying it’s not “fucked up” which you can’t evidence.