/home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-220 hours agoThe Pebble Has Been Brought Backstore.repebble.comexternal-linkmessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1372arrow-down114file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1358arrow-down1external-linkThe Pebble Has Been Brought Backstore.repebble.com/home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-220 hours agomessage-square90fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squaren2burns@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 hours agoYour response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agoAs I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.
Your response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”
As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.