• Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This feels a little too tinfoil-hat for me. The reality is that one strong password is going to be more secure than 50 weak passwords. If you use something like a passphrase with 30+ characters, cracking it with today’s methods will take longer than the heat death of the universe. Yes, it means all of your eggs are in one basket. But that’s why it’s important that basket is protected like Fort Knox.

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      And change the master password every year or two, which likely also upgrades the key used to encrypt your secrets. Someone breaking into your password manager is a lot less likely than someone breaking into one of the dozens or even hundreds of services you probably reuse passwords on.

      • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Someone breaking into your password manager is a lot less likely than someone breaking into one of the dozens or even hundreds of services you probably reuse passwords on.

        Exactly. Without a password manager, every single service you have reuses your password on is a security risk, because any one of them will compromise the rest. And it has repeatedly been demonstrated that even large software companies don’t follow best practices regarding passwords. So any one of them being compromised is a risk. With a password manager, as long as it is properly encrypted and secured with a strong master password, the only point of attack will be your master password.

        It’s less about keeping all your eggs in one basket, and more about reducing attack vectors that hackers have access to. With reused passwords, every single individual service is a potential vector of attack.

        • sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          And do yourself a favor and get MFA on that password manager. That dramatically increases the skill level needed to hack your master pass.

          • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Several of the larger password managers have started requiring MFA on new accounts. Bitwarden, for example, now requires at least an email verification. They encourage you to use other MFA methods instead, like an Authenticator app. But they at least have the email as a last-ditch “fucking fine, you really don’t want to install an Authenticator app? Here, we’re forcing you to use this as the bare minimum” backup.

            • sugar_in_your_tea
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              And that’s how it should be. In fact, I switched banks to the only one I could find that had MFA, because I value security as an option.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This feels a little too tinfoil-hat for me.

      Nah a lot of those services are ripe for abuse… The correct answer is to just use your own… keepass for “offline” on a USB stick type of thing… or host your own vaultwarden.